Thu 31 May 2007
In the last 24 hours, I’ve seen no fewer than six news articles that point out the fact that noted trend follower John W. Henry’s Strategic Allocation Portfolio is in a deep drawdown.
Here’s an excerpt from the article referenced above:
“
How bad does it look? You can see the figures at Henry’s own Web site, and they are astonishing. Since December 2004, his main investment fund has lost a stunning 36%. And according to a report in the May 29 Wall Street Journal Henry’s slide continues, as Merrill Lynch has redeemed $600 million from the firm.
While a simple index fund over that period would have turned each $10,000 into about $12,450, Henry’s “Strategic Allocation” fund has turned the same amount of money into a mere $6,360. Except we’re not actually talking $10,000. We’re talking hundreds of millions of dollars.
“
36% drawdown over 2 and a half years is stunning? Was it more stunning when the S&P 500 index shed approximately 50% of its value from 2000 to 2002? How about the fact that the NASDAQ composite index is currently at a roughly 50% drawdown that is over 7 years in duration!  Everything is relative, but only the recent is sensational…
Equity Curve Timing at its Worst
Notice that Merrill is redeeming funds. On the surface, this may seem a prudent way to conserve capital, but now they will need to find someplace else to invest that money. Like a trader who jumps from system to system each time one of them is in a drawdown, this tactic makes it very difficult to succeed in the long run. All systems will have drawdowns, and while much has been said about the deep drawdowns that trend following systems experience, I’ve seen very little written on the fact that when they recover from that drawdown, they tend to do so with blinding quickness!
Value of Diversification
I don’t tend to follow the results of John W. Henry’s Strategic Allocation Fund, but I do watch the returns of the Financials and Metals portfolio with great interest. At the time of this writing, the Financials and Metals would have turned a $1,000 investment in 1984 to over $100,000 today. An equivalent investment in the S&P 500 index would have grown to just under $16,000. More importantly, both the Financials and Metals and the Strategic Allocation Fund show a slight negative correlation with the S&P 500. This is the classic “one zigs when the other zags†type of investment assets that we would want to have in a well-diversified portfolio.Â
Opportunity for investing
I don’t recommend any investment products, and the primary purpose of this site is to follow the returns of my forex trading systems. Incidentally, my systems are trend following in nature and have recently come upon hard times as well. With all of that being said though, the recent media attention to the Death of Trend Following smells like a bottom. Remember, proper equity curve timing is never easy.