December 2011


 

It’s never easy.

Running the Automatic 7 systems this year has been a great success and a great challenge.  As 2011 draws to a close, all I can say is, it’s never easy to choose an allocation, and it’s never easy to deliver strong returns.  I don’t suppose I should expect it to be.

Gold

Gold is an interesting buggar.  I got it into the mix in mid – 2011 and proceeded to do all sorts of batty things that were not indicated by the system.  At the end of the year, in my personal account, I lost about 4% of my equity trading in gold despite its theoretically positive contribution to A7′s 2011 returns.  For 2012, I resolve to trade gold only within the confines of the system.

MLPs

I suspect that not having Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) in the rotation is a blind spot and I would like to add AMJ to the rotation, but I have not as of yet.  I will probably need to see a longer track record on this ETN (gasp, an Exchange Traded Note) before adding it in, if at all.

Following the plan

Besides gold, I had a couple of notable deviations from the plan in 2011.  For one thing, I really levered up on treasury futures in September / October, and I also found myself doing put spreads on IWM in the 4th quarter.  Um, yeah, there was no reason for that, and it hurt overall returns.  I will track my actual returns in 2012, just as I used to do when I traded forex.  This tends to keep me following the system, as I don’t want to have to confess my baseless deviations in public.

Over thinking / tinkering

It is very difficult to avoid the urge to over think and over tinker with these systems…yes indeed, doing nothing is the hardest thing to do!  I noticed today that a very simple version of A7 (which will be called A7 Vanilla) returned almost 20% this year. Going forward, I will use this simple version as a benchmark for a couple of fancier optimized versions.

2012 A7 system variations:

For 2012, I will be publishing seven flavors of A7 and stop tracking external TAA systems.  External benchmarking is time consuming and it doesn’t add that much value to this site.  I will link to other people’s systems as appropriate in the “Influences” section.

So here is the list of systems that I will be maintaining; please note, that as of today, this is not a signal service, and I do not provide investment advice.  In the name of having an accurate, replicable track record, I will make every attempt to publish the allocations of all A7 variations in real time; however, if time does not permit me to do so, then I will publish only the A7 Vanilla portfolio in real time with the others being posted shortly thereafter.

 

A7 Vanilla – benchmark – simple parameters – not optimized

A7 Classic – benchmark – optimized for maximum absolute returns; no leverage

A7 Smooth– optimized for absolute return and smoothness of ride; no leverage; Goal: Beat A7 on a risk adjusted basis; does not attempt to beat A7 Classic on an absolute basis

A7 Plus– optimized for absolute return and smoothness of ride; sometimes uses leverage (primarily levers treasuries via the futures market); Goal: Beat A7 and A7 Vanilla on absolute and risk adjusted basis, and beat A7 Smooth on an absolute basis.  A tall order!  This is what I have been trading since August 2011, and I do believe if I ever ran a hedge fund or other money management firm, this would be the aggressive version available to the public.

A7 Timid (aka Mom and Pop) – optimized for smoothness of ride; Goal: Beat 50/50 benchmark on absolute and risk adjusted basis…and to use a cliché, “achieve stock-like returns with bond-like volatility”.  Again, if I ran a hedge fund, this would be the conservative version available to the public.

A7 Full Tilt – optimized for smoothness of ride; utilizes 2x leverage at all times – Goal: Maximum return in a margin account.

A7 actual – Ed’s actual results in taxable account (attempting to mimic A7 Full Tilt, at least until the drawdowns cause a nervous breakdown!); will show deviation from A7 Full Tilt because of commissions, slippage, use of futures and options instead of margined ETFs, and operator error.  Goal: Beat A7 plus on an absolute basis and be volatile enough for my high risk tolerance.

50/50 – benchmark — SPY/IEF – not optimized

Note, I use the term “smoothness of ride” to denote a proprietary optimization function that bears resemblance to a Sortino ratio.

Allocations for January 2012 will be published tomorrow.  Happy new year!

 

Automatic 7 was up 1% in the month of November, while Mom and Pop was up 0.8%.

In the first 12 months of live trading, A7 was up 22.1% and Mom and Pop was up 10%.  December is likely to be pretty close to flat (despite the swoon in gold…damn Federal Reserve ;-) ), leaving A7 up double digits for calendar 2011.

For next year, I will be doing less external benchmarking and more tracking of various flavors of my A7 portfolios.

Growth of $1
Month A7 M&P Msci 50/50 GTAA VT
12/2010 1.073 1.030 1.017 1.016 1.046 1.077
1/2011 1.103 1.043 1.006 1.028 1.049 1.092
2/2011 1.146 1.063 1.036 1.045 1.077 1.124
3/2011 1.163 1.073 1.020 1.044 1.072 1.123
4/2011 1.206 1.101 1.070 1.069 1.111 1.172
5/2011 1.183 1.094 1.055 1.076 1.082 1.145
6/2011 1.154 1.081 1.039 1.064 1.060 1.130
7/2011 1.172 1.098 1.069 1.071 1.059 1.106
8/2011 1.253 1.110 1.082 1.066 1.005 1.025
9/2011 1.242 1.106 1.021 1.041 0.978 0.916
10/2011 1.209 1.092 1.027 1.091 0.981 1.019
11/2011 1.221 1.100 1.025 1.092 0.963 1.006
Current Drawdown 2.6% 0.9% 5.2% 0.0% 13.3% 14.1%
Returns A7 M&P Msci 50/50 GTAA VT
Last Month 1.0% 0.8% -0.2% 0.1% -1.8% -1.2%
Year to Date 13.8% 6.8% 0.8% 7.5% -7.9% -6.5%

Systems / Benchmarks:

A7  (Automatic 7 – EdMamula.com aggressive)

M&P (Mom and Pop – EdMamula.com conservative)

Msci (MarketSci TAA)

50/50 – 50% SPY / 50% IEF

(GTAA) Cambria Global Tactical ETF

VT – Vanguard Total World Stock ETF

Notes:

Interactive Brokers Tier I USD Margin Interest rate applied to leveraged portfolios (A7)

MyETFHedgeFund.com portfolios have been removed;  the aggressive model is no longer freely available.

 

« Previous Page